This assignment for WP3 has gotten
me the most excited for an assignment all year! I love having creative freedom
when working with a topic and this assignment definitely allows creativity.
Over the course of the quarter we have learned so much about genres and their conventions.
Understanding a genre and which audiences they are intended for has become
something of great importance over the last few weeks. For this assignment, I
will be using the article “The Research Paper, and Why We
Should Still Care” by Doug Brent and will be converting the material into an
appealing way for a younger audience and then another option that would appeal
to an older audience and use my own moves in doing so.
The article
itself focuses on why the research paper is still important in today’s world.
When I read through the article tonight, something that stuck out to me was how
people were disputing the name “research paper”. People argue that this term is
too broad and it does not well define the genre. Instead, a name that people
think is better suited for the genre is “reading to write” or “writing from
sources”. The article focuses on evidence as to why these terms may better suit
the genre and would appeal to those writing. I came up with a very abstract
idea to appeal to an older audience. I thought of creating an obituary for the
term research paper. In this obituary, I would use the traditional set-up of an
obituary to include an announcement of death, biographical sketch, family,
service times, special messages and maybe incorporate some type of photos. I
would make up some details to fit some of the descriptions but would focus on
incorporating history of the research paper that is spread throughout the
article. In addition, I would really focus on backing up this information with
the transition to the new type of research paper which is considered “writing
from sources”. I would make “writing from sources” the new generation, or
children, or the formerly known research paper and give more information about
this genre and how and why this is different. Although it is abstract, I think
that it is unique and would definitely appeal to an older audience while still
sharing the information that is included in this article!
Again, for
the genre for a younger audience, this is an extremely abstract idea. I am
thinking of doing a product review of the well-known toy “research paper”. This
toy has awesome features (all the features of a research paper which I will
explain in kid-friendly tones) but unfortunately it is not a great review. This
toy is being compared to “writing from sources”, the new toy that hit the block
this spring. Both of these toys will be on Amazon.com and will be set up to
seem like the customer is trying to decide which to choose. The features of the
“toys”, really how these papers are defined differently, will be the main
product description for each. I will compare how they are the same and
different and make it very realistic with customer reviews and ratings. I think
that this idea of toys will be appealing to a younger audience and the
comparison between the two definitions will really shine through.
I really
appreciate the amount of creativity we have with this project and I cannot wait
to see how it turns out as well as everyone else’s!